4.7 Article

Top partners and scalar dark matter: A nonminimal reappraisal

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.075004

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large set of models beyond the Standard Model suggests that the top quark has a special role in fundamental interactions, and some of these models also predict the existence of a particle responsible for dark matter. In certain cases, dark matter may be closely related to the top sector. This study investigates the interaction between top-philic dark matter and multiple vector-like top partners, which is a common setup in composite scenarios. By using an effective model, the researchers explore how the presence of these vector-like fermions affects the collider and cosmological phenomenology compared to the minimal model with only one vector-like mediator.
A large set of models beyond the Standard Model of particle physics suggest that the top quark plays a special role in fundamental interactions. At the same time some of these models predict that a particle responsible for dark matter is present in the physical spectrum of the theory, and in particular cases dark matter may be specially linked to the top sector. Such a new physics configuration occurs, for instance, in composite frameworks that additionally feature vectorlike quarks as mediators of the interactions of the dark matter with the Standard Model. We investigate the interplay of top-philic dark matter and the presence of several vectorlike top partners. Such a nonminimal setup with several vectorlike fermions is typical of composite scenarios, and we make use of an effective model to study to which extent such nonminimality modifies the collider and cosmological phenomenology of the minimal model, the latter only including one vectorlike mediator of the dark matter interactions with the Standard Model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available