4.6 Article

Fluctuations and stability of a fast-driven Otto cycle

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 107, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195437

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a stochastic approach, we investigate the impact of system coherences on the fluctuation behavior of a thermal machine. Heat exchange with the cold bath leads to increased system instabilities, while coupling with the hot bath improves cycle precision and reduces thermodynamic fluctuations below the classical bound. Coherence suppression not only restores cycle cooling but also enhances the convergence of fluctuation relations by increasing entropy production. Our findings shed light on thermodynamic relations at the stochastic level, despite the simplicity of our model.
We investigate the stochastic dynamics of a thermal machine realized by a fast-driven Otto cycle. By employing a stochastic approach, we find that system coherences strongly affect fluctuations depending on the thermodynamic current. Specifically, we observe an increment in the system instabilities when considering the heat exchanged with the cold bath. On the contrary, the cycle precision improves when the system couples with the hot bath, where thermodynamic fluctuations reduce below the classical thermodynamic uncertainty relation bound. Violation of the classical bound holds even when a dephasing source couples with the system. We also find that coherence suppression not only restores the cycle cooling but also enhances the convergence of fluctuation relations by increasing the entropy production of the reversed process. An additional analysis unveiled that the stochastic sampling required to ensure good statistics increases for the cooling cycle while downsizes for the other protocols. Despite the simplicity of our model, our results provide further insight into thermodynamic relations at the stochastic level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available