4.6 Article

Diabetes Mellitus risk prediction using age adaptation models

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.1043812022

Keywords

Adaptive learning; Adaptive learning Disease prediction; Feature compensation; Diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, machine learning methods were used to investigate age adaptation in Diabetes Mellitus risk prediction. A novel age adaptation algorithm was proposed based on feature compensation and soft decision threshold adjustment. Experimental results showed that the accuracy rates of diabetes models were considerably improved using compensated features, solving the problem of data scarcity in specific age ranges.
Conventional disease prediction models frequently have imbalanced or insufficient observed samples. In a real-world situation, the learned model from an imbalanced dataset may have poor generalization ability. In this paper, we use machine learning methods to investigate age adaptation in Diabetes Mellitus (DM) risk prediction. Typical machine learning algorithms for DM prediction include Linear Regression (LR), Logistic Regression, Polynomial Regression (PR), Neural Network (NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and XGboost (XGB). Based on feature compensation and soft decision threshold adjustment, we propose a novel age adaptation algorithm. The results were validated using the publicly available Pima Indian Diabetes Dataset. The experimental results show that the disease risk prediction model's efficiency and accuracy are promising. The performance dropped for different age groups when using the original features. Using the compensated features, the accuracy rates for DM models were improved considerably. Age adaptation methods can be trained on one age group and adapted to another, solving the problem of data scarcity in a specific age range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available