4.6 Article

Moving Vehicle Tracking Under Measurement Uncertainties, Multi-Step Random Delays, and Packet Dropouts

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 52381-52391

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3280858

Keywords

WSN; multi-step delay; multiple packet dropouts; UFIR filter; Kalman filter; game theory H infinity filter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the UFIR filter, KF, and game theory H-8 filter are proposed for vehicle tracking in WSNs with multi-step random delays and multiple dropouts. The problem of data delays is solved by converting a model with delays to another without delays. The dropouts are detected and compensated for by prediction. Experimental tests using a vehicle tracking database show that the UFIR filter is the most robust, KF is the most accurate when delay probabilities are known, and the game theory H-8 filter is the most accurate under ideal conditions but prone to divergency otherwise.
The unbiased finite impulse response (UFIR) filter, Kalman filter (KF), and game theory H-8 filter are developed for vehicle tracking in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) with multi-step random delays and multiple dropouts. The problem with data delays is solved for given delay probabilities by converting a model with delays to another without delays. The dropouts are detected at the receiver by a data sensor, and lost data are compensated for by prediction. The filters developed are experimentally tested for accuracy and robustness using the Global Positioning System-based vehicle tracking database, where the measured coordinates are transmitted over WSN with delays. It is shown that the UFIR filter is the most robust to uncertain delays and the KF is the most accurate when the delay probabilities are known exactly. The game theory H-8 filter is the most accurate under ideal conditions and prone to divergency otherwise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available