4.6 Article

A lattice-based public key encryption scheme with delegated equality test

Journal

COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2023.103758

Keywords

Post quantum security; Learning with errors; Public key encryption; Equality test; Offline message recovery attack

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ordinary encryption techniques cannot meet the needs of comparing, sharing, and classifying data hidden in ciphertexts in the face of growing threats to data security. The advent of the quantum computing era has brought unprecedented challenges to traditional cryptography. Fortunately, a lattice-based PKEET scheme can solve these problems by providing satisfying anti-quantum computing security and resisting OMRA attacks. This paper presents a lattice-based PKE-DET scheme that supports delegated tester function and demonstrates security under the LWE hardness assumption in the standard model. The scheme offers advantages such as high security, delegated tester authorization, and small storage space compared to existing schemes.
When data security is facing growing threats, ordinary encryption techniques cannot meet the needs of comparing, sharing, and classifying data hidden in ciphertexts. At the same time, the advent of the quantum computing era has brought unprecedented challenges to traditional cryptography. Fortunately, a lattice-based PKEET scheme can solve the above problems. In this paper, we design a lattice-based PKE-DET scheme that can support the delegated tester function with satisfying anti-quantum computing security and resisting OMRA attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first PKE-DET scheme that has both kinds of security at the same time. Under the standard model, we prove the security of the scheme based on the LWE hardness assumption. Compared with existing schemes, our scheme has many advantages, such as high security, delegated tester authorization, and small storage space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available