4.7 Article

Characterisation of hydrodynamic trapping in microfluidic cross-slot devices for high strain rate applications

Journal

LAB ON A CHIP
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages 3092-3105

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3lc00256j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrodynamic trapping of particles in micro-nano scale applications has provided significant insights. Among non-contact methods, image-based real-time control in cross-slot microfluidic devices shows promise for single cellular assays. Experiments in different channels with varying control delay and magnification achieved sustained trapping of 5 μm diameter particles at high strain rates. The maximum attainable strain rate depends on the control delay and particle resolution, and with further improvements, higher strain rates can be achieved for single cellular assay studies.
Hydrodynamic trapping of a particle or cluster of particles based on contact and non-contact approaches has brought prominent insights to micro-nano scale applications. Of the non-contact methods, image-based real-time control in cross-slot microfluidic devices is one of the most promising potential platform for single cellular assays. Here, we report results from experiments conducted in two cross-slot microfluidic channels of different widths, with varying real-time delay of the control algorithm and different magnification. Sustained trapping of 5 mu m diameter particles was achieved with high strain rates, of order 10(2) s(-1), higher than in any previous studies. Our experiments show that the maximum attainable strain rate is a function of the real-time delay of the control algorithm and the particle resolution (pixel/mu m). Therefore, we anticipate that with further reduced time delays and enhanced particle resolution, considerably higher strain rates can be attained, opening the platform to single cellular assay studies where very high strain rates are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available