4.6 Article

Impact of the extent of recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphadenectomy on thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world multicentre study

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad168

Keywords

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Lymph node dissection; Recurrent laryngeal nerve

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the impact of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node (LN) dissection on the survival and postoperative complications in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The results showed that both the unilateral RLN-LN dissection plus standard two-field lymphadenectomy (U-2FL) and total two-field lymphadenectomy (T-2FL) groups had significantly better outcomes compared with the standard two-field lymphadenectomy (S-2FL) group. Adequacy of RLN-LN dissection is an important prognosticator for improved overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with thoracic ESCC.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node (LN) dissection on survival and postoperative complications in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 thoracic ESCC who underwent oesophagectomy and two-field lymphadenectomy from three institutions were included. The entire cohort was divided into three groups that underwent the total two-field lymphadenectomy (T-2FL), standard two-field lymphadenectomy (S-2FL) or unilateral RLN-LN dissection plus S-2FL (U-2FL) based on the extent of RLN-LN dissection. Subgroup analyses were also performed and were stratified by treatment modality. RESULTS: Both the U-2FL and T-2FL groups had significantly superior outcomes compared with the S-2FL group (overall survival: U-2FL versus S-2FL: P = 0.002; T-2FL versus S-2FL: P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival: U-2FL versus S-2FL: P = 0.01; T-2FL versus S-2FL: P < 0.001). Moreover, no significant differences were observed between U-2FL and T-2FL regarding overall survival (P > 0.05) and recurrence-free survival (P > 0.05), irrespective of administration of neoadjuvant therapy plus oesophagectomy or upfront oesophagectomy. Additionally, the extent of RLN-LN dissection was not an independent predictor of stage migration (P = 0.14) but was for postoperative nodal upstaging (P = 0.02). Notably, S-2FL brought significantly lowered risk in postoperative complications, especially for RLN palsy, when compared with T-2FL (P = 0.002) but not U-2FL (P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Adequacy of RLN-LN dissection is an important prognosticator for improved overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with thoracic ESCC. U-2FL may serve as an alternative to T-2FL in selected populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available