4.7 Article

Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on Multisensor Information Coupling and Attentional Feature Fusion

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3269115

Keywords

Feature extraction; Couplings; Fault diagnosis; Data mining; Fuses; Vibrations; Machinery; Bearing fault diagnosis; multilayer feature fusion; multisensor information fusion; mutual attention mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a novel multisensor information coupling network (MICN) for bearing fault diagnosis, which handles the signals from the same or different types of sensors, and extracts deeper features by layer by layer fusion. A novel feature-level information coupling model is developed based on the mutual attention mechanism during the multilayer feature fusion process. Several different experiments are designed to validate the efficiency and superiority of the proposed method.
The effective fault diagnosis of bearing can guarantee the safety of rotating machinery and is very important for its stable operation. The information fusion of multisensor data has been a feasible method to enhance the performance of fault diagnosis. However, how to fuse the joint information from different channels or even different kinds of sensors is still an important challenge. This study proposes a novel multisensor information coupling network (MICN) for bearing fault diagnosis, which handles the signals from the same or different types of sensors, and the deeper features can be extracted from multisensors independently and simultaneously fused layer by layer. Especially, during the multilayer feature fusion process, a novel feature-level information coupling model is developed based on the mutual attention mechanism. Finally, to validate the efficiency of the proposed method, several different experiments are designed, and the results show the validity and superiority.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available