4.6 Article

Sex differences in resting-state functional networks in awake rats

Journal

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
Volume 228, Issue 6, Pages 1411-1423

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-023-02657-4

Keywords

Sex differences; Resting state; fMRI; Awake; Rat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are sex-related differences in brain disorders and psychophysiological traits, and it is important to understand these differences in brain function between males and females in humans and animal models. However, little is known about the differences in brain-wide functional connectivity patterns between male and female rats, despite efforts to address sex differences in behaviors and disease models in rodents.
Sex-related differences can be found in many brain disorders and psychophysiological traits, highlighting the importance to systematically understand the sex differences in brain function in humans and animal models. Despite emerging effort to address sex differences in behaviors and disease models in rodents, how brain-wide functional connectivity (FC) patterns differ between male and female rats remains largely unknown. Here, we used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) to investigate regional and systems-level differences between female and male rats. Our data show that female rats display stronger hypothalamus connectivity, whereas male rats exhibit more prominent striatum-related connectivity. At the global scale, female rats demonstrate stronger segregation within the cortical and subcortical systems, while male rats display more prominent cortico-subcortical interactions, particularly between the cortex and striatum. Taken together, these data provide a comprehensive framework of sex differences in resting-state connectivity patterns in the awake rat brain, and offer a reference for studies aiming to reveal sex-related FC differences in different animal models of brain disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available