4.7 Article

Ship Detection From Raw SAR Echo Data

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3271905

Keywords

Synthetic aperture radar; Marine vehicles; Imaging; Radar imaging; Sensors; Detectors; Oceans; Raw echo data; ship detection; synthetic aperture radar (SAR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a ship detection method for raw SAR echo data is proposed based on a nonimaging target sensing paradigm. By analyzing the one-dimensional sequence data, ships can be detected without the need for SAR imaging, opening up new possibilities for ship detection in the ocean.
In the context of ship monitoring in the ocean, targets are usually sparsely distributed. Thus, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging of the whole scene is usually quite redundant and costly. However, raw SAR echo data were considered to be useless before focusing. Few studies have attempted to detect ships from raw SAR echo data. It seems to be an impossible task since the resolution of raw SAR echo data is too low. This article proposes a ship detection method for raw SAR echo data in view of a nonimaging target sensing paradigm. The core idea is that we can sense the existence of ships from raw SAR echo data without imaging. The underlying rationale is that the radar always speaks the same sentence, i.e., usually an exactly identical linear frequency modulated (LFM) signal, while target and clutter answer differently. The difference spread into each part of the whole echo sequence rather than only the focused energy after match filtering. Thus, the ships can be found by pattern analysis on one-dimension sequence data rather than two-dimension images. The experimental results based on simulation and typical real data validate our assumption. This study shows that SAR imaging is an unnecessary intermediate process and opens up new significant possibilities for ship detection in the vast ocean.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available