4.3 Article

The nutritional quality of gluten-free vs. non-gluten-free pre-packaged foods and beverages sold in Hong Kong

Journal

ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
Volume 79, Issue 3, Pages 301-312

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000530857

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The consumption of gluten-free foods has been increasing, and it is important to understand their nutritional quality compared to non-gluten-free foods. This study examined pre-packaged foods in Hong Kong and found that non-gluten-free products had higher energy, protein, saturated fat, trans-fat, free sugar, and sodium content, and lower fiber compared to gluten-free products. Consumers should be educated on how to identify gluten-free foods as many do not declare this information on the label.
Introduction: The consumption of gluten-free foods has continued to increase in recent years. Given their higher intake amongst individuals both with or without a medically diagnosed gluten allergy or sensitivity, it is important to understand how the nutritional quality of these foods compares against non-gluten-free foods. As such, we aimed to compare the nutritional quality of gluten-free and non-gluten-free pre-packaged foods sold in Hong Kong.Methods: Data from 18,292 pre-packaged food and beverage items in the 2019 FoodSwitch Hong Kong database were used. These products were categorized as (1) declared gluten-free; (2) gluten-free by ingredient or naturally gluten-free and (3) non-gluten-free according to information presented on the package. One way ANOVA was used to compare the differences in the Australian Health Star Rating (HSR), energy, protein, fibre, total fat, saturated fat, trans-fat, carbohydrates, sugars and sodium content between products in different gluten categories, overall and by major food category (e.g., bread and bakery products) and region of origin (e.g., America, Europe).Results: Products declared gluten-free (mean +/- SD: 2.9 +/- 1.3; n = 7%) had statistically significantly higher HSR than those gluten-free by ingredient or naturally gluten-free (2.7 +/- 1.4; n = 51.9%) and non-gluten-free (2.2 +/- 1.4; n = 41.2%) (all pairwise comparisons p < 0.001). Overall, non-gluten-free products have higher energy, protein, saturated fat, trans-fat, free sugar and sodium, and less fibre compared with products in the other two gluten categories. Similar differences were observed across major food groups and by region of origin.Conclusions: Non-gluten-free products sold in Hong Kong were generally less healthy than gluten-free products (regardless of presence of gluten-free declaration). Consumers should be better educated on how to identify gluten-free foods given many gluten-free foods do not declare this information on the label.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available