4.7 Article

First time-resolved measurement of infrared scintillation light in gaseous xenon

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11618-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the first measurement of the time profile of the infrared scintillation response of gaseous xenon. The study reveals that the infrared light yield is comparable to the ultraviolet yield and the infrared pulses can be described by a fast and a slow component. The results also show that the size of the slow component decreases with increasing levels of impurities in the gas and the infrared emission is affected by the gas pressure.
Xenon is a widely used detector target material due to its excellent scintillation properties in the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum. The additional use of infrared (IR) scintillation light could improve future detectors. However, a comprehensive characterization of the IR component is necessary to explore its potential. We report on the first measurement of the time profile of the IR scintillation response of gaseous xenon. Our setup consists of a gaseous xenon target irradiated by an alpha particle source and is instrumented with one IR- and two UV-sensitive photomultiplier tubes. Thereby, it enables IR timing measurements with nanosecond resolution and simultaneous measurement of UV and IR signals. We find that the IR light yield is in the same order of magnitude as the UV yield. We observe that the IR pulses can be described by a fast and a slow component and demonstrate that the size of the slow component decreases with increasing levels of impurities in the gas. Moreover, we study the IR emission as a function of pressure. These findings confirm earlier observations and advance our understanding of the IR scintillation response of gaseous xenon, which could have implications for the development of novel xenon-based detectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available