4.1 Article

Reading Speed Using the International Reading Speed Texts in a Normal Canadian Cohort

Journal

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38196

Keywords

amblyopia; paragraph reading; international reading speed texts; reading speed; reading

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the applicability of the International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) in a normal Canadian population. The results show that our cohort read slower compared to the IReST standards. Additionally, reading speed decreases with age. The use of British English in the test materials may also contribute to the lower reading speed. Therefore, it is important to evaluate IReST in different populations to ensure reliable comparison standards for future research.
Background The International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) are commonly used to measure reading speed, which may be affected in many eye conditions. They were originally tested in a younger British population. Our study evaluates IReST in a normal Canadian population.Methodology A normal Canadian cohort in Ontario was prospectively recruited with age >14 years, education >9 years, English as the primary language, and best-corrected visual acuity >20/25 distance and >N8 near in each eye. Participants with eye conditions and neurological/cognitive problems were excluded. Each participant consecutively read two IReST passages (passages 1 and 8). Reading speed in words per minute (WPM) was calculated. One-sample t-test was used to compare our cohort to published IReST standards.Results A total of 112 participants were included (35 male, 77 female). The mean age was 40 +/- 17 years (14-18 years: 12; 18-35 years: 34; 35-60 years: 53; 60-75 years: 13). The mean reading speed for passage 1 was 211 +/- 33 WPM compared to the published IReST standard of 236 +/- 29 WPM (p < 0.0001). The mean reading speed for passage 8 was 218 +/- 34 WPM compared to the IReST standard of 237 +/- 24 WPM (p < 0.0001). Thus, our cohort read slower for both passages compared to IReST standards. The mean reading speed for passages 1 and 8 was the highest for the 14-18-year (231 and 239, respectively) and the lowest for the 60-75-year group (195 and 192, respectively).Conclusions Normal older populations have slower reading compared to younger populations. The slower reading in our cohort may also be because the passages were in British rather than in Canadian English. It is important that the IReST is evaluated in different populations to ensure reliable comparison standards for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available