4.7 Article

Search for Higgs boson pair production in the bb over line μ plus μ - final state at the LHC

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034014

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion and vector boson fusion in the bb overbar mu+mu- final state at the LHC is studied to probe the Higgs self-coupling kappa lambda and the four-boson HHVV coupling kappa 2V for the first time. A cut-based analysis and a machine-learning analysis using boosted decision trees are performed with categorizations and optimizations depending on the variations of these couplings. The expected sensitivities and constraints on the couplings at 95% confidence level are calculated.
The Higgs boson pair production via gluon-gluon fusion and vector boson fusion in the bb over bar mu+mu- final state at the LHC is studied to probe the Higgs self-coupling kappa lambda and the four-boson HHVV coupling kappa 2V for the first time. A cut-based analysis and a machine-learning analysis using boosted decision trees are performed with categorizations and optimizations depending on the variations of these couplings. The expected sensitivities are extracted with different integrated luminosities assumed up to the full high -luminosity LHC runs. The expected upper limit at 95% confidence level on the Higgs boson pair production is calculated as 47 (28) times the Standard Model cross section using the cut-based method (boosted decision trees) for the gluon-gluon fusion production and 928 for the vector boson fusion production, assuming an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb-1. The expected constraints on the couplings at 95% confidence level are calculated to be -13.8 < kappa lambda < 19.1 (-10.0 < kappa lambda < 15.5) and -3.4 < kappa 2V < 5.5 using the cut-based method (boosted decision trees), respectively, assuming an integrated luminosity of 3000 fb-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available