4.3 Article

To support the use of NT-proBNP to better detect heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes

Journal

ENDOCRINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03419-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heart failure is a chronic disease that causes a significant number of deaths each year. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is a major risk factor for heart failure, and investigating NT-proBNP may help identify heart failure in diabetic patients. This study aims to characterize diabetic patients prescribed with NT-proBNP in primary care settings.
Purpose Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease that causes approximately 300,000 and 250,000 deaths per year in Europe and United States, respectively. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is one the major risk factors of HF, and the investigation of NT-proBNP might support the early identification of HF in T2DM sufferers. Nevertheless, this parameter is poorly investigated. Thus, we aimed to demographically and clinically characterize diabetic patients which were prescribed with NT-proBNP in the primary care setting.Methods Using a primary care database, we formed a cohort of patients aged =18 years diagnosed with T2DM between 2002 and 2021. A multivariate Cox model was adopted to assess the determinants associated with the prescription of NTproBNP.Results Among 167,961 T2DM patients, 7558 (4.5%, 95% CI: 4.4-4.6) were prescribed with NT-proBNP. Males and increasing age were expectedly associated with a higher propensity to be prescribed with NT-proBNP. In addition, a significant association was found for those suffering from obesity, ischemic cardiomyopathy, stroke, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and with a Charlson Index of 2+.Conclusion These determinants might contribute to investigate the NT-proBNP in T2DM sufferers. A decision support system to appropriately ease the prescription of NT-proBNP might be therefore implemented in primary care settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available