4.4 Article

Impact of tubal patency test selection on the live birth rate following intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained infertility: a retrospective cohort study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
Volume 308, Issue 2, Pages 621-629

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07091-9

Keywords

Hysterosalpingography; Diagnostic laparoscopy; Intrauterine insemination; Unexplained infertility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the impact of selecting hysterosalpingography (HSG) or diagnostic laparoscopy on the effectiveness of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in couples with unexplained infertility. The results showed no significant difference in treatment outcomes between HSG and laparoscopy in terms of clinical pregnancy and live birth rate after ovarian stimulation and IUI. After adjusting for potential confounders, the outcomes remained comparable between the two groups.
ObjectiveWe planned a study to evaluate the impact of selecting hysterosalpingography (HSG) over diagnostic laparoscopy during initial fertility evaluation on IUI treatment outcomes in couples diagnosed with unexplained infertility.MethodsThe study comprised a retrospective cohort and included couples evaluated for infertility at our tertiary level hospital between January 2008 and December 2019. Couples diagnosed with unexplained infertility based on tubal patency tests (either HSG or diagnostic laparoscopy) were included. We compared outcomes following ovarian stimulation (OS) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) between women who underwent HSG versus laparoscopy for up to three treatment cycles.ResultsA total of 7413 women were screened, out of which 1002 women were diagnosed with unexplained infertility. We did not find a significant statistical difference in the clinical pregnancy (16.7% vs. 11.7%; OR (odds ratio) 1.51; 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.90-2.5) or live birth rate per IUI cycle (15.1% vs. 10.7%; OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.9-2.6) in women who underwent HSG for tubal evaluation as compared to laparoscopy. After adjustment for potential confounders through multivariate analysis, we found that outcomes were comparable between the HSG and laparoscopy.ConclusionThe current study did not find any significant difference in treatment outcomes following OS and IUI in women with unexplained infertility who underwent HSG compared to laparoscopy for the assessment of the tubal patency during the initial fertility workup. The finding suggests minimal or no impact of selecting HSG over diagnostic laparoscopy as a tubal patency test on the subsequent IUI outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available