4.4 Article

Inter-laboratory comparison of plant volatile analyses in the light of intra-specific chemodiversity

Journal

METABOLOMICS
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-023-02026-6

Keywords

Thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Plant metabolites; Proficiency test; Quality assurance; Quality control; Reproducibility; Standardisation; Static headspace collection; Tansy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the reproducibility of VOC collections and analyses was investigated in a ring trial involving five laboratories. The results showed that despite efforts to standardize each VOC measurement step, there were still differences in the outcomes both qualitatively and quantitatively. These findings reveal sources of variation in plant VOC research and can help avoid systematic errors in similar experiments.
IntroductionAssessing intraspecific variation in plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) involves pitfalls that may bias biological interpretation, particularly when several laboratories collaborate on joint projects. Comparative, inter-laboratory ring trials can inform on the reproducibility of such analyses.ObjectivesIn a ring trial involving five laboratories, we investigated the reproducibility of VOC collections with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and analyses by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS). As model plant we used Tanacetum vulgare, which shows a remarkable diversity in terpenoids, forming so-called chemotypes. We performed our ring-trial with two chemotypes to examine the sources of technical variation in plant VOC measurements during pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical steps.MethodsMonoclonal root cuttings were generated in one laboratory and distributed to five laboratories, in which plants were grown under laboratory-specific conditions. VOCs were collected on PDMS tubes from all plants before and after a jasmonic acid (JA) treatment. Thereafter, each laboratory (donors) sent a subset of tubes to four of the other laboratories (recipients), which performed TD-GC-MS with their own established procedures.ResultsChemotype-specific differences in VOC profiles were detected but with an overall high variation both across donor and recipient laboratories. JA-induced changes in VOC profiles were not reproducible. Laboratory-specific growth conditions led to phenotypic variation that affected the resulting VOC profiles.ConclusionOur ring trial shows that despite large efforts to standardise each VOC measurement step, the outcomes differed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Our results reveal sources of variation in plant VOC research and may help to avoid systematic errors in similar experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available