4.5 Article

A randomised controlled trial comparing two protocols of preoperative antibiotics in patients with positive urine culture undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 8, Pages 2225-2232

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04483-z

Keywords

Antibiotic; Sepsis; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Urine culture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to compare the outcomes of two different protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with positive urine culture undergoing PCNL. The results showed no difference in infectious complication rates between patients who received 1 week of sensitive antibiotics and those who received shorter duration of prophylaxis with sensitive antibiotics for 48 hours prior to procedure.
AimTo compare the outcomes of two different protocols of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with positive urine culture undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Materials and methodsPatients were prospectively enrolled for the randomised study to either group A which included patients where an attempt to sterilise the urine was made with a 1 week course of sensitive antibiotics or group B that included patients who received a shorter duration of prophylaxis using sensitive antibiotics for 48 h prior to procedure which was continued for 48 h postoperatively. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had a positive preoperative urine culture. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups.ResultsA total of 80 patients randomised into two groups of 40 each based on the antibiotic protocol used were analysed in the study. There was no difference in infectious complication rates between groups on univariate analysis. The rate of SIRS in Group A and Group B was found to be 20% (N = 8) and 22.5% (N = 9) respectively. The rate of septic shock in Group A and Group B was 7.5% and 5% respectively. On multivariate analysis, longer duration of antibiotics did not decrease the risk of sepsis compared to shorter antibiotic course (p = 0.79).ConclusionAttempts to sterilise urine before PCNL may not decrease the risk of sepsis in patients with positive urine culture undergoing PCNL and may only result in unnecessary prolonging of antibiotic usage thereby increasing the chances of antibiotic resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available