4.7 Article

(Epi)catechin damage effects on the development of mouse intestinal epithelial structure through the PERK-eIF2α-ATF4-CHOP pathway

Journal

FOOD & FUNCTION
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages 6665-6677

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3fo01841e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used intestinal organoids as an in vitro model to analyze the effects of four (epi)catechins on the development of the intestinal epithelial structure. The results showed that (epi)catechins promoted intestinal epithelial apoptosis and stress response, leading to intestinal damage and increased risk of intestinal injury.
As powerful bioactive compounds found in a variety of plant-based foods, (epi)catechins have been identified to be associated with an abundant array of health benefits. While their adverse impacts have also been gaining increasing attention, their intestinal impact is still unclear. In this study, intestinal organoids were used as an in vitro model to analyze the effects of four (epi)catechins on the development of the intestinal epithelial structure. Morphological characteristics, oxidative stress, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress assays with (epi)catechins treatment showed that (epi)catechins promoted intestinal epithelial apoptosis and stress response. These effects had dose-dependent and structural differences (EGCG > EGC > ECG > EC). Furthermore, GSK2606414, a protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK) pathway inhibitor, confirmed that the PERK-eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 & alpha; (eIF2 & alpha;)-activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)-C/EBP-homologous protein (CHOP) pathway is closely related to the damage. In addition, the results for the intestinal inflammatory mouse model further verified that (epi)catechins significantly delayed intestinal repair. Taken together, these findings revealed that overdosage of (epi)catechins has damage potential on the intestinal epithelium and may increase the risk of intestinal damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available