4.7 Article

Anticancer effects of phytol against Sarcoma (S-180) and Human Leukemic (HL-60) cancer cells

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 33, Pages 80996-81007

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-28036-4

Keywords

Phytol; Diterpenoid; Cancer cell lines; Anticancer effects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the anticancer effects of Phytol on sarcoma 180 and human leukemia cell lines. The results show that Phytol significantly reduces cell viability and division rate, induces DNA damage and apoptosis, and exhibits potential anticancer effects.
Phytol (Pyt), a diterpenoid, possesses many important bioactivities. This study evaluates the anticancer effects of Pyt on sarcoma 180 (S-180) and human leukemia (HL-60) cell lines. For this purpose, cells were treated with Pyt (4.72, 7.08, or 14.16 mu M) and a cell viability assay was performed. Additionally, the alkaline comet assay and micronucleus test with cytokinesis were also performed using doxorubicin (6 mu M) and hydrogen peroxide (10 mM) as positive controls and stressors, respectively. Results revealed that Pyt significantly reduced the viability and rate of division in S-180 and HL-60 cells with IC50 values of 18.98 +/- 3.79 and 1.17 +/- 0.34 mu M, respectively. Pyt at 14.16 mu M exerted aneugenic and/or clastogenic effects in S-180 and HL-60 cells, where the number of micronuclei and other nuclear abnormalities (e.g., nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds) were frequently observed. Moreover, Pyt at all concentrations induced apoptosis and showed necrosis at 14.16 mu M, suggesting its anticancer effects on the tested cancer cell lines. Taken together, Pyt showed promising anticancer effects, possibly through inducing apoptosis and necrosis mechanisms, and it exerted aneugenic and/or clastogenic effects on the S-180 and HL-60 cell lines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available