4.5 Article

Effect analysis on regeneration speed of continuous regeneration-diesel particulate filter based on NO2-assisted regeneration

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 9-17

Publisher

TURKISH NATL COMMITTEE AIR POLLUTION RES & CONTROL-TUNCAP
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2015.06.012

Keywords

Diesel particulate filter (DPF); Continuous regeneration (CR); NO2-Assisted regeneration; Regeneration speed

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51176045]
  2. National Studying Abroad Foundation Project by the China Scholarship Council [201208430262, 201306130031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to improve the regeneration speed of Continuous Regeneration-Diesel Particulate Filter (CR-DPF) based on NO2-assisted regeneration, a mathematic model of the NO2-assisted regeneration is developed and verified by experiments and numerical simulation. Furthermore, the influences on regeneration speed from exhaust airflow and filter structure are studied in NO2-assisted regeneration process of CR-DPF. The results show that: the regeneration speed will be increased due to the increase of the volume of the exhaust gas, the temperature of the exhaust gas, the concentration of the NO2 and the concentration of the O-2 in exhaust gas, but the regeneration speed will be decreased under other conditions such as m(NO2)/m(PM) being less than its threshold in exhaust gas, the increase of the filter length in CR-DPF or the increase of the channel density when initial amount of the carbon particles in filter being less than its threshold, moreover, thickness of channel wall has no effect on regeneration speed. And the suitable range of values for some key parameters being useful for enhancing regeneration speed and reducing pressure drop of CR-DPF has been provided. Copyright (C) 2015 Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available