4.4 Article

Removal of senescent cells reduces the viral load and attenuates pulmonary and systemic inflammation in SARS-CoV-2-infected, aged hamsters

Journal

NATURE AGING
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages 829-+

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43587-023-00442-w

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that age-associated cellular senescence is a factor contributing to the severity of COVID-19. Aged hamsters accumulate senescent cells in the lungs, and ABT-263 can deplete these cells. Compared to young hamsters, aged hamsters have a higher viral load and more complications during COVID-19. Early treatment with ABT-263 can reduce pulmonary viral load and improve lung disease.
Older age is one of the strongest risk factors for severe COVID-19. In this study, we determined whether age-associated cellular senescence contributes to the severity of experimental COVID-19. Aged golden hamsters accumulate senescent cells in the lungs, and the senolytic drug ABT-263, a BCL-2 inhibitor, depletes these cells at baseline and during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Relative to young hamsters, aged hamsters had a greater viral load during the acute phase of infection and displayed higher levels of sequelae during the post-acute phase. Early treatment with ABT-263 lowered pulmonary viral load in aged (but not young) animals, an effect associated with lower expression of ACE2, the receptor for SARS-CoV-2. ABT-263 treatment also led to lower pulmonary and systemic levels of senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors and to amelioration of early and late lung disease. These data demonstrate the causative role of age-associated pre-existing senescent cells on COVID-19 severity and have clear clinical relevance. Delval, Hantute-Ghesquier, Sencio and colleagues demonstrate that depletion of age-associated senescent cells decreases pulmonary viral load and ameliorates early and late lung COVID-19 in a hamster model of aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available