4.7 Article

[18F]FDG PET/MRI in children suffering from lymphoma: does MRI contrast media make a difference?

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09840-5

Keywords

Positron-emission tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Lymphoma; Neoplasm staging; Contrast media

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the influence of an MRI contrast agent application on staging in pediatric lymphoma patients using [F-18]FDG PET/MRI. The results showed that the use of MRI contrast agents did not provide any benefit in the primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients, suggesting that a contrast agent-free [F-18]FDG PET/MRI protocol should be considered.
ObjectivesEvaluate the influence of an MRI contrast agent application on primary and follow-up staging in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma using [F-18]FDG PET/MRI to avoid adverse effects and save time and costs during examination.MethodsA total of 105 [F-18]FDG PET/MRI datasets were included for data evaluation. Two different reading protocols were analyzed by two experienced readers in consensus, including for PET/MRI-1 reading protocol unenhanced T2w and/or T1w imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and [F-18]FDG PET imaging and for PET/MRI-2 reading protocol an additional T1w post contrast imaging. Patient-based and region-based evaluation according to the revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Staging System (IPNHLSS) was performed, and a modified standard of reference was applied comprising histopathology and previous and follow-up cross-sectional imaging. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests.ResultsIn patient-based analysis, PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 both determined a correct IPNHLSS tumor stage in 90/105 (86%) exams. Region-based analysis correctly identified 119/127 (94%) lymphoma-affected regions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 were 94%, 97%, 90%, 99%, 97%, respectively. There were no significant differences between PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2.ConclusionsThe use of MRI contrast agents in [F-18]FDG PET/MRI examinations has no beneficial effect in primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients. Therefore, switching to a contrast agent-free [F-18]FDG PET/MRI protocol should be considered in all pediatric lymphoma patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available