4.7 Article

Production of Hollow Bacterial Cellulose Microspheres Using Microfluidics to Form an Injectable Porous Scaffold for Wound Healing

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 23, Pages 2983-2992

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201600898

Keywords

3D cell culture; bacterial cellulose; hollow microspheres; injectable scaffold; wound healing

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore
  2. National Research Foundation BDTA
  3. National Medical Research Council IAF
  4. Singapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a biocompatible material with high purity and robust mechanical strength used to fabricate desirable scaffolds for 3D cell culture and wound healing. However, the chemical resistance of BC and its insolubility in the majority of solutions make it difficult to manipulate using standard chemical methods. In this study, a microfluidic process is developed to produce hollow BC microspheres with desirable internal structures and morphology. Microfluidics is used to generate a core-shell structured microparticle with an alginate core and agarose shell as a template to encapsulate Gluconacetobacter xylinus for long-term static culture. G. xylinus then secretes BC, which becomes entangled within the shell of the structured hydrogel microparticles and forms BC microspheres. The removal of the hydrogel template via thermal-chemical treatments yields robust BC microspheres exhibiting a hollow morphology. These hollow microspheres spontaneously assemble as functional units to form a novel injectable scaffold. In vitro, a highly porous scaffold is created to enable effective 3D cell culture with a high cell proliferation rate and better depth distribution. In vivo, this injectable scaffold facilitates tissue regeneration, resulting in rapid wound-healing in a Sprague Dawley rat skin model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available