3.8 Review

Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients in the Postoperative Phase of Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 162-172

Publisher

KOREAN ACAD REHABILITATION MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5535/arm.23022

Keywords

Myocardial revascularization; Breathing exercise; Pulmonary function tests; Exercise

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review evaluated the evidence on inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in patients post cardiac surgery. IMT was found to have positive effects on maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), peak expiratory flow (PEF), tidal volume (TV), and length of hospital stay, but no impact on functional capacity.
To review the evidence about inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in patients in postoperative of cardiac surgery. We conducted this systematic review used the databases Ovid, LILACS, CINAHL, PubMed, PEDro, and CENTRAL. Randomized clinical trials that addressed IMT after cardiac sur-gery were selected. The outcomes assessed were maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), tidal volume (TV), peak expiratory flow (PEF), functional capacity (6-minute walk test) and length of hospital stay. The mean difference between groups and the respective 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and used to quantify the effect of con-tinuous outcomes. Seven studies were selected. The IMT was superior to the control over MIP 15.77 cmH2O (95% CI, 5.95-25.49), MEP 15.87 cmH2O (95% CI, 1.16-30.58), PEF 40.98 L/min (95% CI, 4.64-77.32), TV 184.75 mL (95% CI, 19.72-349.77), hospital stay-1.25 days (95% CI,-1.77 to-0.72), but without impact on functional capacity 29.93 m (95% CI,-27.59 to 87.45). Based on the results presented, IMT was beneficial as a form of treatment for patients after car-diac surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available