3.8 Article

Analytical Unreliability of 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D Measurements in Pre-Term Neonates

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 856-870

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfad033

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vitamin D supplementation is commonly given to neonates and infants due to limited vitamin D stores at birth, but over-supplementation can lead to toxicity. This study found fluctuations in 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in pre-term neonates receiving supplementation, and discrepancies between different immunoassay platforms and LC-MS/MS measurements. It suggests that neonatal 25-hydroxy vitamin D measurements alone should not be used for nutritional monitoring and other clinical and laboratory parameters should be considered.
Background Vitamin D supplementation is common practice for neonates and infants due to limited stores of vitamin D at birth. Although not commonly encountered, vitamin D toxicity can occur due to over-supplementation. However, toxic concentrations are often not included in method validation experiments, and assays often are not validated in the neonatal population. Methods We compared serial 25 hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] measurements in pre-term neonates receiving 25(OH)D supplementation and identified 12 patients wherein concentrations of 25(OH)D were above 50 ng/mL (125 nM) that required additional investigations as the 25(OH)D results did not match the clinical picture. Available samples were compared across 4 immunoassay platforms (LIAISON XL, Roche Cobas e602, Abbott Alinity i, and Siemens Centaur XP) and LC-MS/MS. Results Concentrations of 25(OH)D observed on one individual immunoassay platform (LIAISON XL) fluctuated substantially between subsequent blood draws in select neonates with elevated concentrations. Serum samples from these patients showed variable agreement between LC-MS/MS and other immunoassay platforms. These fluctuations were not explained by the presence of 3-epimer-25(OH)D or 24,25(OH)(2)D. Conclusions Although we were unable to identify a cause for the variable elevated results, our findings suggest that neonatal 25(OH)D measurements alone should not be used for assessment of nutritional monitoring, and that clinical correlation and other laboratory parameters including ionized calcium should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available