4.7 Article

Characterization of a Polymer-Based, Fully Organic Prosthesis for Implantation into the Subretinal Space of the Rat

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 5, Issue 17, Pages 2271-2282

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201600318

Keywords

biocompatibility; conjugated polymers; RCS rats; retinal prosthesis; silk fibroin

Funding

  1. Telethon - Italy [GGP12033, GGP14022]
  2. EU [FP7-PEOPLE-212-ITN 316832]
  3. Fondazione Cariplo [ON-IRIS 2013-0738]
  4. Compagnia di San Paolo [4191]
  5. Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2013-02358313]
  6. Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replacement strategies arise as promising approaches in case of inherited retinal dystrophies leading to blindness. A fully organic retinal prosthesis made of conjugated polymers layered onto a silk fibroin substrate is engineered. First, the biophysical and surface properties are characterized; then, the long-term biocompatibility is assessed after implantation of the organic device in the subretinal space of 3-months-old rats for a period of five months. The results indicate a good stability of the subretinal implants over time, with preservation of the physical properties of the polymeric layer and a tight contact with the outer retina. Immunoinflammatory markers detect only a modest tissue reaction to the surgical insult and the foreign body that peaks shortly after surgery and progressively decreases with time to normal levels at five months after implantation. Importantly, the integrity of the polymeric layer in direct contact with the retinal tissue is preserved after five months of implantation. The recovery of the foreign-body tissue reaction is also associated with a normal b-wave in the electroretinographic response. The results demonstrate that the device implanted in nondystrophic eyes is well tolerated, highly biocompatible, and suitable as retinal prosthesis in case of photoreceptor degeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available