4.0 Article

Polymorphisms in TIE2 and ANGPT-1 genes are associated with protection against diabetic retinopathy in a Brazilian population

Journal

ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SBEM-SOC BRASIL ENDOCRINOLOGIA & METABOLOGIA
DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000624

Keywords

ANGPT-1 gene; TIE2 gene; polymorphism; type 2 diabetes mellitus; diabetic retinopathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the association between SNPs in the TIE2 and ANGPT-1 genes and diabetic retinopathy (DR). The study included 603 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and DR as cases, and 388 patients with T2DM for more than 10 years without DR as controls. The results showed that certain genotypes and alleles of TIE2 and ANGPT-1 SNPs were associated with protection against DR in a Brazilian population.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between SNPs in the TIE2 and ANGPT-1 genes and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Subjects and methods:This study comprised 603 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and DR (cases) and 388 patients with T2DM for more than 10 years and without DR (controls). The TIE2 rs639225 (A/G) and rs638203 (A/G) SNPs and the ANGPT-1 rs4324901 (G/T) and rs2507800 (T/A) SNPs were genotyped by real-time PCR usingTaqMan MGB probes. Results: The G/G genotype of the rs639225/TIE2, the G/G genotype of the rs638203/ TIE2 and the T allele of the rs4324901/ANGPT-1 SNPs were associated with protection against DR after adjustment for age, glycated hemoglobin, gender, and presence of hypertension (P = 0.042, P = 0.003, and P = 0.028, respectively). No association was found between the rs2507800/ANGPT-1 SNP and DR. Conclusion: We demonstrated, for the first time, the association of TIE2 rs638203 and rsrs939225 SNPs and ANGPT-1 rs4324901 SNP with protection against DR in a Brazilian population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available