4.4 Article

The Room Where It Happens: Clinician Reflections on Returning Preclinical Alzheimer's Biomarker Results to Research Participants

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2023.88

Keywords

Biomarker disclosure; disclosure practices; research clinician experiences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disclosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers to research participants is an increasingly common practice. This study highlights the importance of participant education, dedicated time for the disclosure visit, and tools to facilitate the disclosure process. To effectively train and support clinicians in disclosing AD biomarker results, providing information, shadowing visits, debriefing sessions, and creating a frequently asked questions document are essential. Rating: 9/10
Disclosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers to research participants is a growing practice. Here, we aim to synthesize the experiences of clinicians leading preclinical AD biomarker disclosure. Semi-structured interviews were conducted individually with each of the four clinicians conducting biomarker disclosure as a part of a longitudinal, observational AD cohort study. Study clinicians emphasized the importance of participant education, having adequate time available for the disclosure visit, and forms to facilitate disclosure. To train and support future clinicians conducting AD biomarker disclosure, our study clinicians highlighted providing information about AD and biomarkers, shadowing a disclosure visit, having team debriefing sessions, and collating a frequently asked questions document. To date, this is the first characterization of clinician reflections on disclosing AD biomarker result to cognitively unimpaired research participants. As more clinicians in research or clinical settings seek to disclose AD biomarker results, best practices for training clinicians to lead disclosure are necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available