4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Toward the First Data Acquisition Standard in Synthetic Biology

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages 817-826

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00222

Keywords

data acquisition; characterization; standard; biopart; synthetic biology

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/L011573/1, EP/J02175X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J02175X/1, EP/L011573/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the development of a new data acquisition standard for synthetic biology. This comprises the creation of a methodology that is designed to capture all the data, metadata, and protocol information associated with biopart characterization experiments. The new standard, called DICOM-SB, is based on the highly successful Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard in medicine. A data model is described which has been specifically developed for synthetic biology. The model is a modular, extensible data model for the experimental process, which can optimize data storage for large amounts of data. DICOM-SB also includes services orientated toward the automatic exchange of data and information between modalities and repositories. DICOM-SB has been developed in the context of systematic design in synthetic biology, which is based on the engineering principles of modularity, standardization, and characterization. The systematic design approach utilizes the design, build, test, and learn design cycle paradigm. DICOM-SB has been designed to be compatible with and complementary to other standards in synthetic biology, including SBOL. In this regard, the software provides effective interoperability. The new standard has been tested by experiments and data exchange between Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and Imperial College London.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available