4.4 Article

The superficial branch of the radial nerve and sensory disturbance in the radial forearm flap donor-site

Journal

REGENERATIVE THERAPY
Volume 24, Issue -, Pages 174-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.06.013

Keywords

Radial forearm flap; Donor-site; Reconstructive surgery; Sensory disturbance; Superficial branch of the radial nerve

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively investigated the relationship between the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) preservation method and post-operative sensation at the flap donor-site. The results showed that the zero preservation method had a higher risk of subjective symptoms and objective hypoesthesia development compared to the complete preservation method. Main trunk preservation prevented the development of subjective symptoms. Complete preservation is optimal for RF flap harvest, but main trunk preservation can be considered in cases of perforator crossing.
Introduction: Sensory disturbance due to injury of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) is a donor-site morbidity of the radial forearm (RF) flap. The relationship between the SBRN preservation method and the post-operative sensation at the flap donor-site was retrospectively investigated. Methods: We included 39 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with a free RF flap at Hyogo Cancer Center between April 2014 and March 2018. The patients were classified into the following three groups according to the SBRN preservation method: group 1, zero preservation, excision of the entire SBRN; group 2, main trunk preservation, excision of all branches except the main trunk of the SBRN; and group 3, complete preservation, preservation of the entire SBRN. Objective sensations and subjective symptoms at the flap donor-site were analyzed. Results: The mean objective sensory scores were 3.18, 2.97, and 1.78 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 were significant (p = 0.0035 and p = 0.037, respectively). The mean subjective symptom scores were 2.40, 1.33, and 1.40 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3 were significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.019, respectively). Conclusions: Zero preservation method had a higher risk of subjective symptoms and objective hypoesthesia development at the flap donor-site than the complete preservation method. Despite inevitable objective hypoesthesia, the main trunk preservation prevented the development of subjective symptoms. Complete preservation is optimal for RF flap harvest; however, in case of perforator crossing, main trunk preservation is another option. & COPY; 2023, The Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available