4.7 Article

Measurement of Lift-Off Distance and Thickness of Nonmagnetic Metallic Plate Using Pulsed Eddy Current Testing

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2023.3285918

Keywords

Conductivity point of intersection (CPI) feature; eddy current testing (ECT); modified Newton-Raphson method; thickness measurement; T-R sensor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, a new feature, conductivity point of intersection (CPI), is proposed for noncoaxial T-R sensor in pulsed eddy current (PEC) testing. The results of experiments indicate that the thickness of the sample and lift-off of sensor can be accurately inverted based on the modified Newton-Raphson method.
Eddy current testing (ECT) is an efficient method to estimate the thickness of sample, but it is affected by other parameters information including electromagnetic properties and lift-off. In the previous researches, the lift-off point of intersection (LOI) feature has been found in pulsed eddy current (PEC), which can overcome the fluctuation of lift-off. In this article, another feature, i.e., conductivity point of intersection (CPI), is proposed for noncoaxial T-R sensor in PEC. Specifically, the response signals of different sample conductivity almost intersect with each other at the certain time, which can be regarded immune to the conductivity of sample. The analytical solution and numerical solution are conducted, and the results indicate that the intersection point magnitude is mainly related with the parameters of sensor and thickness of samples. Considering the elements related with conductivity in the Hessian matrix exists ill-conditioning, it will produce the magnification of measurement error under iterative inversion process. By referring to the CPI feature, the thickness of the sample and lift-off of sensor can be accurately inverted based on the modified Newton-Raphson method. The experiments are carried out to verify the proposed method, and the error is only 2.9%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available