4.1 Article

Impact of a modified implant macrogeometry on biomechanical parameters and bone-related markers in rats

Journal

BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA ODONTOLOGICA
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0044

Keywords

Dental Implants; Gene Expression; Bone and Bones

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the effect of a modified implant macrogeometry on peri-implant healing and bone-related molecules in rats. The test group, which received implants with modified macrogeometry, exhibited higher counter-torque values and upregulation of OPN expression compared to the control group. These findings suggest that the modified macrogeometry optimized peri-implant healing by modulating OPN expression in the surrounding bone tissue.
This study investigated the impact of a modified implant macrogeometry on peri-implant healing and its effect on bone-related molecules in rats. Eighteen rats received one implant in each tibia: the control group received implants with conventional macrogeometry and the test group received implants with modified macrogeometry. After 30 days, the implants were removed for biomechanical analysis and the bone tissue around them was collected for quantifying gene expression of OPN, Runx2, beta-catenin, BMP-2, Dkk1, and RANKL/OPG. Calcein and tetracycline fluorescent markers were used for analyzing newly formed bone at undecalcified sections of the tibial implants. These fluorescent markers showed continuous bone formation at cortical bone width and sparse new bone formed along the medullary implant surface in both groups. However, higher counter-torque values and upregulation of OPN expression were achieved by test implants when compared to controls. The modified macrogeometry of implants optimized peri-implant healing, favoring the modulation of OPN expression in the osseous tissue around the implants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available