3.8 Proceedings Paper

Random Forest Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Change Using Sentinel-2 Data in Van Yen, Yen Bai Province, Vietnam

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20463-0_27

Keywords

Remote sensing; Land use land cover; Random forest; Sentinel-2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focuses on the land use/cover change in Mu Cang Chai and Van Yen districts, Yen Bai province, Vietnam using time-series of Sentinel-2 images from 2019 to 2020. The random forest classification algorithm is applied to derive the classified land use/cover map, and reference data is collected through visual interpretation using Google Earth. The results show high overall accuracy (90.7% for 2019 and 91.1% for 2020) and significant land use/cover change in the study area, which is evaluated and discussed using the transition matrix.
Land use land cover (LULC) change has become a crucial topic that needs to be addressed when the studying global and local sustainable development. In this research, time-series of Sentinel-2 images from 2019 to 2020 are used to derive LULC change in Mu Cang Chai (MCC) and Van Yen (VY) districts, Yen Bai province, Vietnam. We identified seven main land cover types and collected reference data from visual interpretation using Google Earth. The random forest (RF) classification algorithm is applied to construct the classified LULC map in these regions of Yen Bai province. The classification accuracy of the method is evaluated using producer's accuracy, user's accuracy, overall accuracy, and Kappa coefficient. We obtain a high overall accuracy (90.7%) with a corresponding Kappa coefficient of 0.85 for the classification in 2019. In the case of 2020, overall classification accuracy reaches about 91.1% and 0.87 of the Kappa coefficient. Then, the LULC change area in the period 2019-2020 of the study area is evaluated and discussed by using the transition matrix of LULC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available