4.7 Article

A modified lightweight authenticated key agreement protocol for Internet of Drones

Journal

INTERNET OF THINGS
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.iot.2022.100669

Keywords

Internet of Drones; Authentication; Key agreement; Collision resistant hash; Cryptography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drones can be embedded in the system Internet of Drones for military observation and in a transport system embedded with sensors. Drones have played a significant role in various fields and brought convenience to production and lifestyle. However, the security challenges and privacy issues of the data collected by sensors embedded in drones need to be addressed.
Drones can be embedded in the system Internet of Drones can make a military observation of a region, a transport system embedded with sensors. Drones played a highly important role in different fields and brought great convenience to production and lifestyle. But we know all the data collected by sensors embedded in drones suffer from security challenges and privacy issues. There are a lot of authenticated key agreement protocols for the security of transmitted data through drones. We have analyzed a recent protocol, A lightweight authentication and key agreement scheme for Internet of Dronesby Zhang et al. in the year 2020. We have found that this protocol is not secure against stolen smart card attacks, and the control server stores extra data. We have tried to address security issues of password guessing, anonymity, user/server impersonation, insider attack, and stolen smart card attacks, and man in the middle attack. We have proposed a modified lightweight authenticated key agreement protocol for Internet of Drones. We have proved its security in the random oracle model. We have done a performance analysis of the proposed protocol with relevant protocols that ensures its efficiency and security as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available