4.7 Article

The effectiveness of treatment with probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication: results from an umbrella meta-analysis on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Journal

FOOD & FUNCTION
Volume 14, Issue 16, Pages 7654-7662

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3fo00300k

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This umbrella meta-analysis aimed to summarize the effects of probiotic supplementation on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. The findings indicated that probiotics have a beneficial impact on H. pylori eradication, especially when administered in higher doses (>10 x 10(10) CFU) and with mixed strains.
Background and aims: The purpose of this umbrella meta-analysis was to quantitatively summarize meta-analyses of randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies regarding the effects of probiotic supplementation on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. Methods: A thorough search of the electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar was carried out from the inception up to May 2022. For the evaluation of overall effect sizes, the pooled relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Results: Overall, 18 eligible studies (47 278 participants in total) were included in the study. The findings revealed that probiotics have a beneficial impact on H. pylori eradication (pooled ESRR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.14, p < 0.01, and ESOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.70, 2.03, p < 0.01). Greater effects on H. pylori eradication were observed when higher doses (>10 x 10(10) CFU) and mixed strains were supplemented. Conclusion: The present umbrella meta-analysis suggests that supplementation with probiotics may be considered as an efficient approach to ameliorate H. pylori complications, particularly probiotics with higher CFUs and mixed strains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available