Journal
TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 627-634Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2016.1230917
Keywords
Micronucleus; pesticide; tea gardens; biomarker; genome damage
Categories
Funding
- Fund for Improvement of Science and Technology Infrastructure program (FIST)
- Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India
- Special Assistance Program of the University Grants Commission, New Delhi
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Buccal micronucleus cytome assay was carried out in 47 exposed (sprayers and leaf harvesters), 47 non-exposed (controls) to determine the extent of damage working in the tea plantations of Terai region of West Bengal, India. As the pesticide exposed male workers were found to consume alcohol and smoked cigarettes/bidis, 35 smokers and 30 alcoholics were also included for comparison. Results showed a significant difference in micronuclei (9.91 +/- 2.74, p <= .001), nuclear bud (4.98 +/- 1.31, p <= .001), binucleate (6.26 +/- 2.84, p <= .001), karyorrhectic (8.36 +/- 2.28, p <= .001), pyknotic (5.62 +/- 1.78, p <= .05) as well as karyolytic (6.81 +/- 3.00, p <= .001) nuclei compared with control. Comparison also revealed a higher frequency of micronuclei (6.11 +/- 2.55, p <= .01), nuclear bud (4.06 +/- 1.97, p <= .05), binucleate (4.34 +/- 1.85, p <= .001), karyorrhectic (6.83 +/- 2.12, p <= .001), and karyolytic (6.20 +/- 2.54, p <= .001) nuclei except pyknotic cell in the smoker than control. Frequency of binucleate (3.80 +/- 1.73, p <= .05), karyorrhectic (5.57 +/- 2.34, p <= .05), pyknotic (5.50 +/- 1.36, p <= .05), and karyolytic (6.30 +/- 2.71, p <= .001) nuclei was higher in the alcoholics than control (non-alcoholics), whereas the micronuclei and nuclear bud were found to be non-significant compared with the control. Our analyses also revealed a higher proportion of the micronucleus and the cell death parameters in the pesticide exposed males than females, which indicated that pesticide, smoking, and alcohol may act synergistically to cause more damage to the buccal epithelial cells. However, age and the exposure duration have no influence on the micronucleus and other cell death parameters.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available