4.6 Article

Quantification of 37 glucocorticoids in chicken muscle by UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-MS with parallel reaction monitoring

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 15, Issue 32, Pages 3967-3974

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ay00830d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method for analyzing 37 glucocorticoids in chicken muscle using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS with PRM. The results demonstrated satisfactory sensitivity and recovery rates, indicating the potential of this method as a routine quantification approach for multiple glucocorticoid residues in chicken samples.
The quantification capability of high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) has received increasing interest from analysts. In this study, we present a method for analyzing 37 glucocorticoids in chicken muscle using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS with parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The analytes were extracted using acetonitrile (ACN) containing 0.1% formic acid and subjected to commercial PRiME HLB solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge clean-up. Under optimized conditions, the analytes were separated on an analytical column and subsequently detected using a high-resolution hybrid quadrupole/Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled with PRM scan mode. The Q-Orbitrap with PRM exhibited remarkable sensitivity, with limits of quantification (LOQs) ranging from 0.08 & mu;g kg(-1) to 7.59 & mu;g kg(-1). To validate the method, we conducted intra- and inter-day tests using a blank matrix sample at different spiking levels. The achieved results demonstrated satisfactory recovery values (74.1-97.5%) and precise results (RSDs < 15%) for all the studied analytes. In application, we found dexamethasone with 6.5 & mu;g kg(-1) and fluorometholone with 3.9 & mu;g kg(-1) in two chicken samples. These findings suggest that the UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap system, in conjunction with the SPE sample preparation method, has great potential as a routine quantification approach for multiple glucocorticoid residues in chicken samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available