4.7 Article

Simulation of pollutant diffusion in vegetation open channel based on LBM-CA method

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 27, Pages 71252-71269

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-27359-6

Keywords

Pollutant diffusion; Cellular automata; Lattice Boltzmann method; Flow-vegetation interactions; Vegetation channel; Flow simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a pollution diffusion model that accurately assesses changes in instantaneous river pollution in vegetation open channels. The model is established based on cellular automata and lattice Boltzmann method (LBM-CA). The results show that the LBM-CA model has high accuracy and that pollutants tend to accumulate in vegetation areas, thereby extending the residence time of pollutants. The model incorporates pollution limits, allowing the prediction of basin pollution levels at specific times. The LBM-CA model provides a method for simulating pollutant diffusion in natural rivers.
This paper proposes a pollution diffusion model that accurately assesses changes in instantaneous river pollution in vegetation open channels. The model is established based on cellular automata and lattice Boltzmann method (LBM-CA). Flow influence coefficients are incorporated into cellular automata (CA) to represent the effect of vegetation on pollutant diffusion, while the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is utilized to simulate flow in vegetation open channels and obtain the flow influence coefficients for each cellular. The results show that the LBM-CA model has high accuracy and that pollutants tend to accumulate in vegetation areas, thereby extending the residence time of pollutants. The model incorporates pollution limits, allowing the prediction of basin pollution levels at specific times. The LBM-CA model provides a method for simulating pollutant diffusion in natural rivers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available