4.0 Article

Heart rate variability stabilization in athletes: towards more convenient data acquisition

Journal

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 331-336

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12233

Keywords

autonomic; cardiovascular; monitoring; parasympathetic; stability; vagal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resting heart rate variability (HRV) is a potentially useful marker to consider for monitoring training status in athletes. However, traditional HRV data collection methodology requires a 5-min recording period preceded by a 5-min stabilization period. This lengthy process may limit HRV monitoring in the field due to time constraints and high compliance demands of athletes. Investigation into more practical methodology for HRV data acquisitions is required. The aim of this study was to determine the time course for stabilization of ECG-derived lnRMSSD from traditional HRV recordings. Ten-minute supine ECG measures were obtained in ten male and ten female collegiate cross-country athletes. The first 5min for each ECG was separately analysed in successive 1-min intervals as follows: minutes 0-1 (lnRMSSD(0-1)), 1-2 (lnRMSSD(1-2)), 2-3 (lnRMSSD(2-3)), 3-4 (lnRMSSD(3-4)) and 4-5 (lnRMSSD(4-5)). Each 1-min lnRMSSD segment was then sequentially compared to lnRMSSD of the 5- to 10-min ECG segment, which was considered the criterion (lnRMSSD(Criterion)). There were no significant differences between each 1-min lnRMSSD segment and lnRMSSD(Criterion), and the effect sizes were considered trivial (ES ranged from 007 to 012). In addition, the ICC for each 1-min segment compared to the criterion was near perfect (ICC values ranged from 092 to 097). The limits of agreement between the prerecording values and lnRMSSD(Criterion) ranged from +/- 028 to +/- 045ms. These results lend support to shorter, more convenient ECG recording procedures for lnRMSSD assessment in athletes by reducing the prerecording stabilization period to 1min.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available