4.2 Article

Effect of total intravenous versus inhalation anesthesia on long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Journal

KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages 336-347

Publisher

KOREAN SOC ANESTHESIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4097/kja.22584

Keywords

Anesthetics; Inhalation; Lung neoplasms; Non-small cell lung carcinoma; Propofol; Survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent curative resection. The results showed that TIVA was associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with inhalation anesthesia. Multivariable Cox regression analysis also revealed that TIVA was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and OS.
Background: Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) improves long-term outcomes after cancer surgery compared with inhalation anesthesia. However, its effect on patients undergoing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery remains unclear. We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of TIVA and inhalation anesthesia after cura-tive resection of early-stage NSCLC.Methods: We analyzed the medical records of patients diagnosed with stage I or II NSCLC who underwent curative resection at a tertiary university hospital between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) according to anesthesia type.Results: We included 1,508 patients with stage I/II NSCLC. The patients were divided into the TIVA (n = 980) and Inhalation (n = 528) groups. The two groups were well-balanced in terms of baseline clinical characteristics. The TIVA group demonstrated significantly improved RFS (7.7 years, 95% CI [7.37, 8.02]) compared with the Inhalation group (6.8 years, 95% CI [6.30, 7.22], P = 0.003). Similarly, TIVA was superior to inhalation agents with respect to OS (median OS; 8.4 years, 95% CI [8.08, 8.69] vs. 7.3 years, 95% CI [6.81, 7.71]; P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that TIVA was an inde-pendent prognostic factor related to recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24, 95% CI [1.04, 1.47], P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 1.39, 95% CI [1.12, 1.72], P = 0.002).Conclusions: Propofol-based TIVA was associated with better RFS and OS than inhala-tion anesthesia in patients with stage I/II NSCLC who underwent curative resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available