3.8 Article

Effect of progesterone infused controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) device and timing of gonadotropin stimulation using P.G. 600 on reproductive success in ewes bred out of season

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/tas/txad081

Keywords

gonadotropins; out of season breeding; progesterone; sheep; synchronization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of exogenous progesterone and exogenous gonadotropins in inducing estrus and enhancing fertility in out-of-season breeding ewes. The study found that the use of controlled internal drug releasing devices (CIDR) and P.G. 600 significantly increased the proportion of ewes lambing and the lambing rate. Timing of P.G. 600 did not affect the results, but the combination of CIDR and P.G. 600 enhanced the proportion of lambs born earlier in the lambing season.
Objectives of this study were to determine effects of exogenous progesterone (via controlled internal drug releasing devices; CIDR) in combination with exogenous gonadotropins (PMSG/hCG) use either at CIDR removal or 1 d before CIDR removal to induce estrus and cyclicity and subsequently enhance the proportion of ewes lambing, lambing rate, prolificacy, and days to lambing in ewes bred out of season. Multiparous ewes (n = 414) were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: untreated (U, n = 122), 7 d CIDR (C, n = 97), 7 d CIDR plus P.G. 600 (240 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin [PMSG] and 120 IU human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) at CIDR removal (CPG0, n = 97), and 7 d CIDR plus P.G. 600 (240 IU PMSG and 120 IU hCG) 1 d before CIDR removal (CPG-1, n = 98). Rams (n = 15) were joined with ewes immediately after CIDR removal and remained with ewes for a 21 d breeding period. Lambing data were summarized for the first 10 days of the lambing season and overall. Categorical data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS whereas non-categorical data were analyzed using the mixed procedure. Proportion of ewes lambing in the first 10 d was greater (P < 0.05) for CPG0 and CPG-1 ewes compared with C ewes, which was greater (P < 0.0001) compared with U ewes. Overall proportion of ewes lambing was greater (P & LE; 0.0001) in all treatments utilizing CIDR compared with U ewes, but no differences (P & GE; 0.84) due to P.G. 600 were detected compared with C. Lambing rate in the first 10 d was greater (P < 0.05) for CPG-1 than C, with CPGO being intermediate, and all CIDR-treated ewes being greater than U (P < 0.0001). Overall lambing rate increased (P & LE; 0.0001) in all treatments utilizing CIDR compared with U ewes, but no differences (P & GE; 0.76) due to P.G. 600 were detected compared with C. Prolificacy was similar among all treatments both for the first 10 d of the lambing season (P = 0.86) and overall (P = 0.80). Day of lambing in the lambing season was reduced (P & LE; 0.03) for CPG0 and CPG-1 compared with CIDR-treated ewes, which was reduced (P < 0.0001) compared with U ewes (days 10.6, 9.0, 13.4, and 24.4 & PLUSMN; 0.9 for CPG0, CPG-1, CON, and U, respectively). Though timing of P.G. 600 did not influence results, the combination of CIDR and P.G. 600 enhanced the proportion of lambs born earlier in the lambing season, and incorporating a CIDR with or without P.G. 600 enhanced the overall proportion of ewes lambing and lambing rate in out-of-season breeding scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available