3.8 Proceedings Paper

Solar PV hosting capacity: grid-based vs. market-based scenarios

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/EEM58374.2023.10161916

Keywords

distribution locational marginal price; hosting capacity; low voltage distribution system; distribution energy market; solar photovoltaic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessing the capability of distribution grids to integrate new solar PV installations has been extensively researched. Existing analysis methods fail to consider consumer preferences or economic feasibility. By using market-based optimal power flow and hosting capacity analysis, this study compares the economic and technical limits of solar PV integration in low voltage distribution systems. Findings indicate that relying solely on grid limits does not provide a complete understanding of solar PV integration potential, deterministic power flow is not foolproof for assessing network security, and the number of technically feasible installation sites surpasses the economically feasible ones.
Assessing the capability of a distribution grid to accommodate new solar PV installations, namely its hosting capacity (HC), has been a prevalent research topic. Although providing a technical limit to how much additional solar PV can be integrated into a distribution grid without trespassing operational limits, commonly used HC analysis (HCA) does not consider consumer preferences or the economic feasibility of installations. Using a market-based optimal power flow (MBOPF) and HCA, we compare the economic and technical limits of solar PV capacity integration in low voltage distribution systems (LVDS). Findings illustrate that (1) the PV HC computed using grid limits only does not give a complete picture of solar PV capacity integration potential, (2) linear, deterministic power flow is not a foolproof method for assessing the network-secure amount of PV, and (3) the number of technically feasible installation sites supersedes the economically feasible ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available