4.7 Article

Uncertainty in water transit time estimation with StorAge Selection functions and tracer data interpolation

Journal

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages 2989-3004

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/hess-27-2989-2023

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transit time distributions (TTDs) of streamflow are important for understanding flow and solute transport. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of TTD uncertainty resulting from different model setups. The study finds that the chosen model setup significantly affects the simulation of TTDs and reveals a large uncertainty in the simulated TTDs.
Transit time distributions (TTDs) of streamflow are useful descriptors for understanding flow and solute transport in catchments. Catchment-scale TTDs can be modeled using tracer data (e.g. oxygen isotopes, such as d(18)O) in inflow and outflows by employing StorAge Selection (SAS) functions. However, tracer data are often sparse in space and time, so they need to be interpolated to increase their spatiotemporal resolution. Moreover, SAS functions can be parameterized with different forms, but there is no general agreement on which one should be used. Both of these aspects induce uncertainty in the simulated TTDs, and the individual uncertainty sources as well as their combined effect have not been fully investigated. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the TTD uncertainty resulting from 12 model setups obtained by combining different interpolation schemes for d(18)O in precipitation and distinct SAS functions. For each model setup, we found behavioral solutions with satisfactory model performance for in-stream d(18)O (KGE > 0.55, where KGE refers to the Kling-Gupta efficiency). Differences in KGE values were statistically significant, thereby showing the relevance of the chosen setup for simulating TTDs. We found a large uncertainty in the simulated TTDs, represented by a large range of variability in the 95 % confidence interval of the median transit time, varying at the most by between 259 and 1009 d across all tested setups. Uncertainty in TTDs was mainly associated with the temporal interpolation of d(18)O in precipitation, the choice between time-variant and time-invariant SAS functions, flow conditions, and the use of nonspatially interpolated d(18)O in precipitation. We discuss the implications of these results for the SAS framework, uncertainty characterization in TTD-based models, and the influence of the uncertainty for water quality and quantity studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available