4.7 Article

Physics Informed Trajectory Inference of a Class of Nonlinear Systems Using a Closed-Loop Output Error Technique

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2023.3298217

Keywords

Inference; nonlinear systems; output error; physics informed; state parameterization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a physics informed trajectory inference method for nonlinear systems. The approach combines state and parameter estimation algorithms to infer the trajectory of the nonlinear system using noisy state measurements. The algorithm utilizes a parallel estimated model with a low-pass filter parameterization, which allows for noise attenuation and avoids biased estimation by using estimated states instead of noisy measurements.
Trajectory inference is a hard problem when states measurements are noisy and if there is no high-fidelity model available for estimation; this may arise into high-variance and biased estimates results. This article proposes a physics informed trajectory inference of a class of nonlinear systems. The approach combines the advantages of state and parameter estimation algorithms to infer the trajectory that follows the nonlinear system using online noisy state measurements. The algorithm is composed of a parallel estimated model constructed in terms of a low-pass filter parameterization. The estimated model defines a physics informed model that infers the trajectory of the real nonlinear system with noise attenuation capabilities. The parameters of the estimated model are updated by a closed-loop output error identification algorithm which uses the estimated states instead of the noisy measurements to avoid biased estimation. Stability and convergence of the proposed technique is assessed using Lyapunov stability theory. Simulations studies are carried out under different scenarios to verify the effectiveness of the proposed inference algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available