4.6 Article

Using a Phosphorus Flow Diagram as a Boundary Object to Inform Stakeholder Engagement

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su151511496

Keywords

stakeholder engagement; phosphorus; sustainability; boundary object

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphorus is crucial for life on Earth but its current management is unsustainable. Stakeholder engagement is urgently needed to address the challenges, yet there is limited research on stakeholder views. In this opinion, the authors use a mass flow diagram to understand the complex challenges and incorporate human factors at a national scale. The approach can be generalized to other mass flows and areas, and the authors suggest ways for researchers to identify knowledge gaps and research needs in stakeholder engagement.
Phosphorus (P) is essential for life on Earth, yet its current management is unsustainable. Stakeholder engagement is urgently needed to help ensure that scientific and technical solutions to improve P sustainability meet the needs of diverse groups, yet there are comparatively few studies that provide insights into stakeholder views, perceptions, or concerns. In this opinion, we use a mass flow diagram of P as a boundary object to understand the complex challenges of sustainable P management. In particular, we map US stakeholder groups onto the mass flow diagram to incorporate human factors into mass flows at a national scale. Our approach is grounded in well-established social-scientific methodologies, such as stakeholder mapping and social network analysis, but is applied in a novel way that can be generalized to other mass flows and geographic areas. We then suggest ways that researchers can use the annotated flow diagram to identify both knowledge gaps and research gaps in stakeholder engagement, especially in interdisciplinary or convergence research contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available