4.1 Review

A Systematic Review of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: Treatment Modalities and Outcomes

Journal

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41745

Keywords

systematic review; outcomes; conservative management; screw fixation; surgical fixation; sacral insufficiency fracture; sacroplasty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sacral insufficiency fractures can be treated conservatively, with surgical fixation or sacroplasty. This systematic review compared the outcomes of different treatment modalities and found that sacroplasty resulted in superior pain relief and shorter hospital stay compared to conservative management or surgical fixation. The review included elderly patients with sacral insufficiency fractures and excluded fractures due to high-energy trauma or malignancy or in non-elderly patients. The findings support the use of sacroplasty as the preferred treatment option for these fractures.
Sacral insufficiency fractures can be managed conservatively, by surgical fixation or by sacroplasty. This systematic review compared the outcomes of different treatment modalities to ascertain the best. Studies included in this systematic review were those with sacral insufficiency fracture in elderly patients with some measure of outcomes reported. Fractures due to high-energy trauma or malignancy or in non-elderly patients were excluded. The review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception to January 6, 2022, yielding a total of 4299 papers of which 35 were eligible for inclusion. Pain reduction following sacroplasty (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) difference 5.83, SD 1.14, n = 901) was superior compared with conservative management (VAS difference 3.7, SD 2.71, n = 65) (p <0.0001) and surgical fixation (with screws/rods +/-cement augmentation; VAS difference 4.1, SD 1.106, n = 154) (p< 0.001). There was no significant difference between pain relief following screw fixation and after conservative management (p = 0.1216). Hospital stay duration was shorter following sacroplasty (4.1 days )SD 3.9)) versus fixation (10.3 days (SD 5.59)) (p= 0.0001). Available evidence points to sacroplasty resulting in better pain relief and shorter hospital stay than other treatment options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available