4.6 Article

A Bluetooth 5.1 Dataset Based on Angle of Arrival and RSS for Indoor Localization

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages 81763-81776

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3301126

Keywords

Angle of arrival; bluetooth; indoor localization; dataset

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research presents a data collection campaign of AoA and RSS values from Bluetooth 5.1 compliant tags and anchor nodes deployed in the environment. The methodology and technical details of the data collection process are described, and the resulting dataset and software are made publicly available.
Several Radio-Frequency technologies have been explored to evaluate the efficacy of localization algorithms in indoor environments, including Received Signal Strength (RSS), Time of Flight (ToF), and Angle of Arrival (AoA). Among these, AoA technique has been gaining interest when adopted with the Bluetooth protocol. In this work, we describe a data collection measurement campaign of AoA and RSS values collected from Bluetooth 5.1 compliant tags and a set of anchor nodes deployed in the environment. We detail the adopted methodology to collect the dataset and we report all the technical details to reproduce the data collection process. The resulting dataset and the adopted software is publicly available to the community. To collect the dataset, we deploy four anchor nodes and four Bluetooth tags and we reproduce some representative scenarios for indoor localization: calibration, static, mobility, and proximity. Each scenario is annotated with an accurate ground truth (GT). We also assess the quality of the collected data. Specifically, we compute the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between the AoA estimated by the anchors and the corresponding GT. Additionally, we investigate the packet loss metric which measures the percentage of Bluetooth beacons lost by the anchors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available