4.0 Article

Performance of Geneva & REG; series apple rootstocks grafted with 'Gala Select' in four different replanting soil at Southern Brazil

Journal

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA FRUTICULTURA
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452023305

Keywords

Yield; Yield Efficiency; Precocity; 'G; 213' and 'G; 210'

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic performance of Geneva series apple rootstocks G.202, G.213, G.210, and G.814. G.202 and G.213 were found to be less vigorous and considered dwarfs. G.213 showed the highest efficiency, maintaining its yield efficiency and stability under replanting conditions. All rootstocks reached a goal of 120 tons/ha of accumulated yield in Caxias do Sul-RS, offering faster financial return to growers. G.213 also had higher soluble solids content, indicating the possibility of earlier harvesting. In conclusion, G.210 and G.213 are good options for replanting areas, with G.213 being suitable for more dense systems and G.210 for extreme replanting conditions.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic performance of the Geneva & REG; series apple rootstocks G.202, G.213, G.210 and G.814. The rootstock G.202 and G.213 proved to be the less vigorous, being considered dwarfs. For replanting soil, 'G.210' was considered an efficient alternative. The 'G.213' was the most efficient, in a general point of view, demonstrating that it does not change its yield efficiency and stability characteristics, even under replanting conditions. All rootstocks reached the goal of 120 accumulated tons.ha-1 in Caxias do Sul-RS, highlighting the faster financial return to the growers. 'G.213' has higher soluble solids content, indicating the possibility of an earlier harvesting. It is concluded that the G.210 and G. 213 rootstocks are good options for the areas evaluated, under replanting conditions, mainly G.213 for more dense systems and G.210 for areas under extreme replanting conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available