4.6 Review

Technological advances in fibrin for tissue engineering

Journal

JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/20417314231190288

Keywords

Fibrin hydrogels in tissue engineering; fibrin-polymer composite scaffolds; PEGylated fibrin hydrogels; natural polymer-fibrin hydrogels; particles encapsulated in fibrin hydrogels

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fibrin is a natural polymer with diverse applications in bioengineering and biomedical fields. However, its characteristics, such as shrinkage, degradation, poor mechanical properties, and batch-to-batch variability, limit its broad use. This review critically examines recent advances in composite fibrin scaffolds, chemically modified fibrin hydrogels, and fibrin-based interpenetrated polymer network (IPN) hydrogels for tissue engineering.
Fibrin is a promising natural polymer that is widely used for diverse applications, such as hemostatic glue, carrier for drug and cell delivery, and matrix for tissue engineering. Despite the significant advances in the use of fibrin for bioengineering and biomedical applications, some of its characteristics must be improved for suitability for general use. For example, fibrin hydrogels tend to shrink and degrade quickly after polymerization, particularly when they contain embedded cells. In addition, their poor mechanical properties and batch-to-batch variability affect their handling, long-term stability, standardization, and reliability. One of the most widely used approaches to improve their properties has been modification of the structure and composition of fibrin hydrogels. In this review, recent advances in composite fibrin scaffolds, chemically modified fibrin hydrogels, interpenetrated polymer network (IPN) hydrogels composed of fibrin and other synthetic or natural polymers are critically reviewed, focusing on their use for tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available